C10: Productive seas: fish and shellfish stocks fished sustainably

Short Description

This indicator shows changes in the proportion of commercial fish and shellfish stocks that are within safe biological limits and fished sustainably. The indicator is derived from assessments of individual stocks. Where available, the assessment of stocks against their Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) will be incorporated into the overall indicator. The indicator is linked to UK Marine Strategy (UKMS) Descriptor 3 (Commercial Fish and Shellfish) and the Convention on Biological Diversity sustainable fisheries indicators and is derived from International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) and national stock assessments.

Readiness and links to data

An interim indicator is presented here that shows: C10a, the percentage of stocks of UK interest fished at or below the level capable of producing MSY (FMSY); and C10b, the percentage of stocks with Spawning Stock Biomass (SSB) at or above the level capable of producing MSY (MSY Btrigger).

The assessments used for this interim indicator have been reported under the UKMS Part One (2019) using data from 1990 to 2015 for FMSY and from 1990 to 2016 for MSY Btrigger. Data are also published annually in the form of other indicator UK Biodiversity Indicator B2 – Sustainable fisheries. Data on national shellfish stock assessments are not currently included in the interim C10 indicator but were published as part of the UKMS Part One (2019). Further updates will be made in the next update for UKMS Descriptor 3 and included in the final C10 indicator.

Notes on indicator

Indicator component C10a uses the same metrics as UKMS Descriptor 3.1 (commercial fish), showing the categories that can be assigned to a fish stock considering the reference point FMSY for fishing pressure that will provide the maximum sustainable yield in the long term. Stocks fished above FMSY are considered overfished and will deplete over time. In 2022, a fourth category was included in this indicator ‘percentage in FMSY range’ for few stocks managed under Multi Annual Plans for fisheries and fished above FMSY.

Indicator components

Figure C10a: Marine fish (quota) stocks of UK interest harvested sustainably, 1990 to 2020

Table C10a: Marine fish (quota) stocks of UK interest harvested sustainably, 1990 to 2020

Year Percentage sustainable (less than or equal to FMSY) Percentage unsustainable in the long term (in FMSY range) Percentage unsustainable (above FMSY) Percentage unknown
1990 8.77 1.75 40.35 49.12
1991 7.02 3.51 43.86 45.61
1992 10.53 1.75 43.86 43.86
1993 8.77 0.00 54.39 36.84
1994 10.53 1.75 52.63 35.09
1995 3.51 3.51 56.14 36.84
1996 5.26 3.51 57.90 33.33
1997 5.26 3.51 54.39 36.84
1998 3.51 3.51 59.65 33.33
1999 3.51 1.75 63.16 31.58
2000 5.26 3.51 59.65 31.58
2001 7.02 3.51 61.40 28.07
2002 12.28 5.26 54.39 28.07
2003 21.05 5.26 47.37 26.32
2004 17.54 5.26 49.12 28.07
2005 14.04 7.02 52.63 26.32
2006 14.04 8.77 50.88 26.32
2007 15.79 3.51 54.39 26.32
2008 14.04 3.51 56.14 26.32
2009 22.81 5.26 47.37 24.56
2010 26.32 5.26 42.10 26.32
2011 28.07 8.77 36.84 26.32
2012 33.33 5.26 36.84 24.56
2013 42.10 8.77 26.32 22.81
2014 36.84 8.77 31.58 22.81
2015 38.60 8.77 29.82 22.81
2016 38.60 12.28 26.32 22.81
2017 35.09 10.53 31.58 22.81
2018 42.10 10.53 24.56 22.81
2019 42.10 8.77 26.32 22.81
2020 49.12 7.02 21.05 22.81

Trend description for C10a

Overall, there is evidence of a positive trend towards a greater proportion of stocks fished sustainably in both the long term and in recent years. There is also a decreasing percentage of stocks with unknown status, from almost 50% in 1990 to 23% in 2020. The percentage of fish stocks (including Norway lobster, Nephrops norvegicus) fished at or below FMSY, and/or within acceptable mortality range levels, has increased from 10% in 1990 to 56% in 2020. The percentage fished above FMSY has decreased over the same time period, from 40% of UK quota-fish stocks assessed being fished at levels of fishing pressure above FMSY in 1990 to 21% in 2020.

Assessment of change

Assessments of change are made for the short term, as well as medium and long-term periods. In every case there has been an improvement recorded.

Change since 2018 has also been assessed, with an increase (improvement) in the percentage of quota fish stocks fished at less than or equal to FMSY detected. However, this is based on 3 data points so should be considered as indicative and not evidence of a clear trend.

The assessment results reported here are not directly comparable with other analyses published elsewhere that use different methodologies to explore these indicator components.

Further information on this assessment, along with details on the methodology, is provided in the Assessment background page. Summaries by 25 Year Environment Plan goal and information on indicator links are presented in the Assessment results pages.

Table C10a: Assessment of change

Component Subcomponent Period Date range Percentage change Smoothing function Assessment of change
C10a Percentage sustainable Short term 2015 to 2020 25.58 Loess Improvement
C10a Percentage sustainable Medium term 2010 to 2020 81.59 Loess Improvement
C10a Percentage sustainable Long term 1990 to 2020 355.55 Loess Improvement

Note that assessment categories for the short, medium and long term were assigned based on smoothed data, so percentage change figures in Tables C10a may differ from unsmoothed values quoted elsewhere. Percentage change refers to the difference seen from the first to last year in the specified date range.

Figure C10b: Marine fish (quota) stocks of UK interest with biomass at levels capable of maintaining full reproductive capacity, 1990 to 2020

Table C10b: Marine fish (quota) stocks of UK interest with biomass at levels capable of maintaining full reproductive capacity, 1990 to 2020

Year Percentage sustainable (greater than or equal to MSY BTrigger) Percentage risk of unsustainable (less than MSY BTrigger but greater than BLim) Percentage unsustainable (less than MSY BTrigger and less than BLim) Percentage unknown
1990 28.07 15.79 10.53 45.61
1991 31.58 14.04 12.28 42.10
1992 35.09 14.04 10.53 40.35
1993 36.84 15.79 14.04 33.33
1994 42.10 15.79 10.53 31.58
1995 35.09 17.54 14.04 33.33
1996 36.84 22.81 10.53 29.82
1997 38.60 19.30 10.53 31.58
1998 45.61 15.79 10.53 28.07
1999 42.10 19.30 12.28 26.32
2000 36.84 22.81 14.04 26.32
2001 43.86 15.79 15.79 24.56
2002 43.86 14.04 17.54 24.56
2003 47.37 12.28 17.54 22.81
2004 40.35 21.05 15.79 22.81
2005 40.35 17.54 19.30 22.81
2006 40.35 17.54 19.30 22.81
2007 38.60 19.30 19.30 22.81
2008 45.61 17.54 15.79 21.05
2009 45.61 15.79 17.54 21.05
2010 52.63 10.53 15.79 21.05
2011 57.90 10.53 10.53 21.05
2012 54.39 8.77 15.79 21.05
2013 59.65 8.77 10.53 21.05
2014 57.90 5.26 15.79 21.05
2015 56.14 8.77 14.04 21.05
2016 56.14 10.53 12.28 21.05
2017 57.90 5.26 15.79 21.05
2018 57.90 7.02 14.04 21.05
2019 57.90 5.26 15.79 21.05
2020 57.90 3.51 15.79 22.81

Trend description for C10b

Overall, there is evidence of a positive trend for fish stocks remaining within safe biological limits in the long term, but little change in recent years. There is also a decreasing percentage of stocks with unknown status, from almost 46% in 1990 to 16% in 2020. To maintain the reproductive capacity of stocks, each SSB should be at or above the level capable of producing maximum sustainable yield (that is, MSY Btrigger). The percentage of stocks subject to quota management and achieving this goal has increased from 28% in 1990 to 58% in 2020.

Assessment of change

Assessments of change are made for the short term, as well as medium and long-term periods. In every case there has been an improvement recorded.

Change since 2018 has also been assessed. There was little or no change in marine fish stocks with biomass at levels capable of maintaining full reproductive capacity (that is, greater than or equal to MSY BTrigger). However, this is based on 3 data points so should be considered as indicative and not evidence of a clear trend.

The assessment results reported here are not directly comparable with other analyses published elsewhere that use different methodologies to explore these indicator components.

Further information on this assessment, along with details on the methodology, is provided in the Assessment background page. Summaries by 25 Year Environment Plan goal and information on indicator links are presented in the Assessment results pages.

Table C10b: Assessment of change

Component Subcomponent Period Date range Percentage change Smoothing function Assessment of change
C10b Percentage sustainable Short term 2015 to 2020 3.14 Loess Improvement
C10b Percentage sustainable Medium term 2010 to 2020 17.26 Loess Improvement
C10b Percentage sustainable Long term 1990 to 2020 93.66 Loess Improvement

Note that assessment categories for the short, medium and long term were assigned based on smoothed data, so percentage change figures in Tables C10b may differ from unsmoothed values quoted elsewhere. Percentage change refers to the difference seen from the first to last year in the specified date range.

Indicator Metadata